| | List |
| Subject: | Re: is ipfw "fwd" act same as router ? |
| Poster: | patrice |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:53:25 +0100 |
| Related Postings: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
"patrice" a écrit dans le message de
news:46016fce$0$10412$426a74cc@news.free.fr...
> "Henri Hennebert" a écrit dans le message de
> news:etr432$p07$1@morzine.restart.bel...
> > I have a doubt, does natd tag its table enties with the interface ?
> > in this case, the output packet is tagged with tun0 and the
> > corresponding response is tagged with bge0; the reverse translation is
> > not done.
> >
>
> henri you're the king :)
> you point me in the good direction, i need to catch the packet on the same
> interface:
>
> as outgoing traffic came in throught the switch (same interface than the
> internet modem)
> i ve tried to catch the packet before they arrive on tun0
>
> 02098 divert 3615 log tcp from any to not me dst-port 8080 in via bge0
> 02099 fwd 192.168.0.254 log tcp from 192.168.0.101 to any dst-port 8080
>
> and it run :))
>
not it doesnot :((
i thought i was working because web was ok, but it was because packet are
not trapped, and go throught the tun0
continuing to search ....
|
|